← All Authorities
Hong Kong statutory demandbanking and finance

[2024] HKCFI 2302

[2024] HKCFI 2302
JurisdictionHong Kong
CourtHK Court of First Instance
Year2024
Statusunclear

Summary

Lower court set aside a statutory demand in a banking context, a decision subsequently overturned on appeal.

Key Principle

Lower court decision to set aside a statutory demand that was subsequently overturned on appeal.

Area of Law

banking

Related Cases

Westpac Banking Corporation v Lenthall (2019) 272 CLR 1

A bank owes a duty of care to guarantors to take reasonable steps to ensure they understand the nature and effect of the guarantee under the Code of Banking Practice.

AUSTRAC v Commonwealth Bank of Australia [2018] FCA 930

CBA liable for systemic AML/CTF Act contraventions including failure to report suspicious matters and threshold transactions via intelligent deposit machines, resulting in $700 million civil penalty.

Paciocco v ANZ Banking Group Ltd (Full Federal Court) (2015) 236 FCR 199

Full Federal Court held that bank late payment fees were not penalties or unconscionable under consumer protection law as they bore a genuine pre-estimate of loss or legitimate commercial interest.

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of [2024] HKCFI 2302 and how it applies to your situation.

Explain [2024] HKCFI 2302