← All Authorities
Hong Kong statutory demandguarantees and indemnities

Yeung So Lai v Art Excel Limited [2025] HKCA 957

[2025] HKCA 957
JurisdictionHong Kong
CourtHK Court of Appeal
Year2025
StatusBinding authority

Summary

Court of Appeal reversed setting aside of statutory demand, providing guidance on the application of the Money Lenders Ordinance to creditor claims.

Key Principle

The Court of Appeal provided useful guidance on the Money Lenders Ordinance, allowing a creditor's appeal against setting aside a statutory demand.

Area of Law

banking

Related Cases

Westpac Banking Corporation v Lenthall (2019) 272 CLR 1

A bank owes a duty of care to guarantors to take reasonable steps to ensure they understand the nature and effect of the guarantee under the Code of Banking Practice.

AUSTRAC v Commonwealth Bank of Australia [2018] FCA 930

CBA liable for systemic AML/CTF Act contraventions including failure to report suspicious matters and threshold transactions via intelligent deposit machines, resulting in $700 million civil penalty.

Paciocco v ANZ Banking Group Ltd (Full Federal Court) (2015) 236 FCR 199

Full Federal Court held that bank late payment fees were not penalties or unconscionable under consumer protection law as they bore a genuine pre-estimate of loss or legitimate commercial interest.

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of Yeung So Lai v Art Excel Limited [2025] HKCA 957 and how it applies to your situation.

Explain Yeung So Lai v Art Excel Limit...