← All Authorities
Hong Kong article 35 right to legal advicegrounds illegality

A v Chief Executive

[2013] 4 HKLRD 404
JurisdictionHong Kong
CourtHK Court of First Instance
Year2013
StatusBinding authority

Summary

Section 8(c) applies to considerations of supervised release benefits, sufficiency of sentence served, and community protection in executive discretion.

Key Principle

Court held that section 8(c) applies to considerations of benefits of supervised release, sufficiency of sentence served, and community protection.

Area of Law

constitutional

Related Cases

NZYQ v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship and Multicultural Affairs (2023) 97 ALJR 1005

Indefinite administrative detention of a non-citizen with no real prospect of removal is unlawful as punitive and contrary to Ch III of the Australian Constitution, overruling Al-Kateb v Godwin.

Farm Transparency International v NSW (2022) 276 CLR 81

HCA upheld NSW ag-gag laws as valid notwithstanding a burden on the implied freedom of political communication, applying the structured proportionality test.

Palmer v Western Australia (2021) 272 CLR 505

HCA upheld WA COVID-19 border closure legislation as valid under s.92, finding restrictions on interstate movement were reasonably necessary and proportionate to protect public health.

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of A v Chief Executive and how it applies to your situation.

Explain A v Chief Executive