← All Authorities
United States racial gerrymanderingredistrictingpartisan gerrymandering

Alexander v. South Carolina State Conference of the NAACP

602 U.S. 1 (2024)
JurisdictionUnited States
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
Year2024
StatusBinding authority

Key Principle

In a racial-gerrymandering challenge a plaintiff must overcome a strong presumption of legislative good faith and disentangle race from politics, and where the legislature's motive could be partisan a court must (under clear-error review) attribute the design to permissible partisanship absent an alternative map showing the same political goals could be achieved with materially greater racial balance.

Area of Law

Constitutional / Public Law

Related Cases

Bondi v. VanDerStok 604 U.S. 458 (2025)
Axon Enterprise, Inc. v. Federal Trade Commission 598 U.S. 175 (2023)
Arizona v. City and County of San Francisco 596 U.S. 763 (2022)

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of Alexander v. South Carolina State Conference of the NAACP and how it applies to your situation.

Explain Alexander v. South Carolina St...