United States interventionagency non defensepublic charge

Arizona v. City and County of San Francisco

596 U.S. 763 (2022)

JurisdictionUnited States

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

Year2022

Statusunclear

Key Principle

The Court dismissed the writ of certiorari as improvidently granted (a 'DIG'), declining to decide whether States may intervene to defend the 2019 DHS 'public charge' rule after the federal government ceased to defend it; the per curiam dismissal resolves no merits question and establishes no precedent.

Area of Law

Constitutional / Public Law

Related Cases

Bondi v. VanDerStok 604 U.S. 458 (2025)

Alexander v. South Carolina State Conference of the NAACP 602 U.S. 1 (2024)

Axon Enterprise, Inc. v. Federal Trade Commission 598 U.S. 175 (2023)

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of Arizona v. City and County of San Francisco and how it applies to your situation.

Explain Arizona v. City and County of ...