← All Authorities
United Kingdom jurisdiction in tortbrussels regulationinducing breach of contract

AMT Futures Ltd v Marzillier

[2017] UKSC 13; [2018] AC 439
JurisdictionUnited Kingdom
CourtSupreme Court of the United Kingdom
Year2018
StatusBinding authority

Key Principle

For the purposes of special jurisdiction in tort under Article 5(3) of the Brussels I Regulation (44/2001), the 'place where the harmful event occurred' is the place of the direct and immediate harm, not the place of consequential loss; so a claim against foreign lawyers for inducing clients to breach an English exclusive jurisdiction clause by suing abroad falls to be brought where the foreign proceedings were instigated, not in England.

Area of Law

General

Related Cases

TNLC & Anor v Gambling Commission & Ors [2026] EWHC 891 (TCC)
Aabar Holdings S.A.R.L. and others v Glencore Plc and others [2026] EWHC 877 (Comm)
Waterside Class Limited v Mowi ASA & Ors [2026] CAT 32

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of AMT Futures Ltd v Marzillier and how it applies to your situation.

Explain AMT Futures Ltd v Marzillier