← All Authorities
Australia Leading Case penalty clauses and liquidated damagesguarantees and indemnities

Andrews v ANZ Banking Group (Exception Fees)

[2012] HCA 30
JurisdictionAustralia
CourtHigh Court of Australia
Year2012
StatusBinding authority

Summary

Bank exception fees may constitute unenforceable penalties if they are extravagant or unconscionable in comparison to the lender's greatest loss from breach.

Key Principle

Bank exception fees charged on insufficient funds may be penalties if extravagant relative to the loss.

Area of Law

banking

Related Cases

Westpac Banking Corporation v Lenthall (2019) 272 CLR 1

A bank owes a duty of care to guarantors to take reasonable steps to ensure they understand the nature and effect of the guarantee under the Code of Banking Practice.

AUSTRAC v Commonwealth Bank of Australia [2018] FCA 930

CBA liable for systemic AML/CTF Act contraventions including failure to report suspicious matters and threshold transactions via intelligent deposit machines, resulting in $700 million civil penalty.

Paciocco v ANZ Banking Group Ltd (Full Federal Court) (2015) 236 FCR 199

Full Federal Court held that bank late payment fees were not penalties or unconscionable under consumer protection law as they bore a genuine pre-estimate of loss or legitimate commercial interest.

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of Andrews v ANZ Banking Group (Exception Fees) and how it applies to your situation.

Explain Andrews v ANZ Banking Group (E...