← All Authorities
Australia penaltiesliquidated damagesbank fees

Paciocco v ANZ Banking Group Ltd (Full Federal Court)

(2015) 236 FCR 199
JurisdictionAustralia
CourtFull Court of the Federal Court of Australia
Year2015
StatusBinding authority

Key Principle

Whether a contractual sum (here a bank's credit-card late-payment fee) is an unenforceable penalty is to be judged ex ante, by comparing the stipulated sum against the greatest loss that could conceivably flow from the breach as assessed when the contract was made, not by an ex post comparison with the actual loss caused by the particular breach; on that approach the late-payment fees were not penalties.

Area of Law

banking

Related Cases

Westpac Banking Corporation v Lenthall BMW Australia Ltd v Brewster; Westpac Banking Corporation v Lenthall (2019) 269 CLR 574; [2019] HCA 45
AUSTRAC v Commonwealth Bank of Australia [2018] FCA 930
Andrews v ANZ Banking Group (Exception Fees) [2012] HCA 30

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of Paciocco v ANZ Banking Group Ltd (Full Federal Court) and how it applies to your situation.

Explain Paciocco v ANZ Banking Group L...