← All Authorities
United Kingdom civil recoverymortgage fraud

ARA v Olupitan

[2007] EWHC 162 (QB)
JurisdictionUnited Kingdom
CourtHigh Court of Justice (Queen's Bench Division)
Year2007
StatusBinding authority

Key Principle

In the first final decision on a contested Part 5 POCA 2002 recovery application, property obtained by mortgage fraud, conspiracy to defraud and money laundering is recoverable property, proved on the balance of probabilities and independently of any criminal conviction.

Area of Law

General

Related Cases

TNLC & Anor v Gambling Commission & Ors [2026] EWHC 891 (TCC)
Aabar Holdings S.A.R.L. and others v Glencore Plc and others [2026] EWHC 877 (Comm)
Waterside Class Limited v Mowi ASA & Ors [2026] CAT 32

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of ARA v Olupitan and how it applies to your situation.

Explain ARA v Olupitan