← All Authorities
United Kingdom unless orderssanctionsnon payment of costs

Aramco Trading Fujairah FZE v Gulf Petrochem FZC

[2021] EWHC 2650 (Comm)
JurisdictionUnited Kingdom
CourtHigh Court (Queen's Bench Division, Commercial Court)
Year2021
StatusPersuasive authority

Key Principle

The imposition of a sanction (such as striking out or debarring a defence) for non-payment of an interlocutory costs order is an exercise of the court's discretion under its inherent jurisdiction; costs orders, and sanctions for their non-payment, serve to discourage irresponsible interlocutory applications and unjustified resistance, and the court will act to protect the integrity of its process where its orders are disregarded.

Area of Law

General

Related Cases

TNLC & Anor v Gambling Commission & Ors [2026] EWHC 891 (TCC)
Aabar Holdings S.A.R.L. and others v Glencore Plc and others [2026] EWHC 877 (Comm)
Waterside Class Limited v Mowi ASA & Ors [2026] CAT 32

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of Aramco Trading Fujairah FZE v Gulf Petrochem FZC and how it applies to your situation.

Explain Aramco Trading Fujairah FZE v ...