← All Authorities
United Kingdom freezing injunctionrisk of dissipationunlawful means conspiracy

Arcelormittal USA LLC v Ruia & Ors

[2020] EWHC 740 (Comm)
JurisdictionUnited Kingdom
CourtHigh Court of Justice (Business and Property Courts, Commercial Court)
Year2020
StatusBinding authority

Key Principle

A worldwide freezing order will be refused unless the applicant demonstrates by solid evidence a real risk that a future judgment will go unsatisfied through unjustified dissipation of assets, and the applicant must give full and frank disclosure on a without-notice or on-notice freezing application.

Area of Law

General

Related Cases

TNLC & Anor v Gambling Commission & Ors [2026] EWHC 891 (TCC)
Aabar Holdings S.A.R.L. and others v Glencore Plc and others [2026] EWHC 877 (Comm)
Waterside Class Limited v Mowi ASA & Ors [2026] CAT 32

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of Arcelormittal USA LLC v Ruia & Ors and how it applies to your situation.

Explain Arcelormittal USA LLC v Ruia &...