← All Authorities
United States Leading Case claim forms

Asahi Metal Industry Co v Superior Court

480 U.S. 102 (1987)
JurisdictionUnited States
CourtUS Supreme Court
Year1987
StatusBinding authority

Summary

Mere placement of a product into the stream of commerce, without more, is insufficient to establish minimum contacts for personal jurisdiction over a foreign defendant.

Key Principle

Mere placement of a product into the stream of commerce, without more, is insufficient to establish minimum contacts for personal jurisdiction.

Area of Law

procedure

Related Cases

Getswift Ltd v Webb (2022) 276 CLR 553

High Court of Australia held there is no power to make a common fund order in favour of litigation funders at the interlocutory stage of a class action.

UBS AG v Tyne (2018) 265 CLR 77

Anshun estoppel bars relitigation where it was unreasonable not to raise the issue in earlier proceedings; re-litigation may also constitute abuse of process.

Palmer v Ayres (2017) 259 CLR 478

High Court of Australia held the reflective loss principle (Prudential Assurance rule) does not apply in Australia, permitting shareholders to recover losses independently of the company.

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of Asahi Metal Industry Co v Superior Court and how it applies to your situation.

Explain Asahi Metal Industry Co v Supe...