← All Authorities
United Kingdom Leading Case resulting trustsguarantees and indemnitiesfailure of basis

Barclays Bank Ltd v Quistclose Investments Ltd

[1970] AC 567
JurisdictionUnited Kingdom
CourtUK House of Lords
Year1970
StatusBinding authority

Summary

Money lent for a specific purpose that fails is held on resulting trust for the lender (the Quistclose trust), not forming part of the borrower's general assets.

Key Principle

Where money is lent for a specific purpose, and that purpose fails, the borrower holds the money on a resulting trust for the lender (the Quistclose trust).

Area of Law

banking

Related Cases

Westpac Banking Corporation v Lenthall (2019) 272 CLR 1

A bank owes a duty of care to guarantors to take reasonable steps to ensure they understand the nature and effect of the guarantee under the Code of Banking Practice.

AUSTRAC v Commonwealth Bank of Australia [2018] FCA 930

CBA liable for systemic AML/CTF Act contraventions including failure to report suspicious matters and threshold transactions via intelligent deposit machines, resulting in $700 million civil penalty.

Paciocco v ANZ Banking Group Ltd (Full Federal Court) (2015) 236 FCR 199

Full Federal Court held that bank late payment fees were not penalties or unconscionable under consumer protection law as they bore a genuine pre-estimate of loss or legitimate commercial interest.

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of Barclays Bank Ltd v Quistclose Investments Ltd and how it applies to your situation.

Explain Barclays Bank Ltd v Quistclose...