← All Authorities
United States Leading Case minority protection

Blasius Industries Inc v Atlas Corp

564 A.2d 651 (Del. Ch. 1988)
JurisdictionUnited States
CourtDelaware Court of Chancery
Year1988
StatusBinding authority

Summary

Board actions that interfere with the shareholder franchise require a compelling justification, imposing a heightened standard of review under Delaware law.

Key Principle

board actions interfering with shareholder franchise require compelling justification

Area of Law

Delaware Corporate Law

Related Cases

Corwin v KKR Financial Holdings LLC 125 A.3d 304 (Del. 2015)

Fully informed and uncoerced stockholder approval of a non-controller transaction cleanses it of fiduciary challenge and applies business judgment review.

Kahn v M&F Worldwide Corp 88 A.3d 635 (Del. 2014)

Under Delaware law, a controlling shareholder merger conditioned ab initio on both special committee approval and majority-of-minority vote earns business judgment review rather than entire fairness scrutiny.

In re Caremark International Inc Derivative Litigation 698 A.2d 959 (Del. Ch. 1996)

Directors must implement adequate information and reporting systems to satisfy their fiduciary duty of oversight; failure to do so may constitute a breach of duty.

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of Blasius Industries Inc v Atlas Corp and how it applies to your situation.

Explain Blasius Industries Inc v Atlas...