← All Authorities
United Kingdom service commissionspromotion criteriapublic service

Boland v Board of Inland Revenue

The Chairman of the Board of Inland Revenue v Finbar Boland and 15 others (Trinidad and Tobago) [2023] UKPC 27
JurisdictionUnited Kingdom
CourtJudicial Committee of the Privy Council (on appeal from Trinidad and Tobago)
Year2023
StatusBinding authority

Key Principle

The Privy Council held the OPPOSITE of the stated principle: while a professional accountancy qualification is required for substantive promotion to Field Auditor III (reg 18/24) and for a 'prelude' acting appointment, it is NOT a requirement for a 'non-prelude' acting appointment under regulation 26. The minimum criteria for substantive promotion do not automatically govern all acting appointments. (Appeal nonetheless dismissed because the officers led no evidence their non-selection stemmed from that qualification error.)

Area of Law

General

Related Cases

TNLC & Anor v Gambling Commission & Ors [2026] EWHC 891 (TCC)
Aabar Holdings S.A.R.L. and others v Glencore Plc and others [2026] EWHC 877 (Comm)
Waterside Class Limited v Mowi ASA & Ors [2026] CAT 32

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of Boland v Board of Inland Revenue and how it applies to your situation.

Explain Boland v Board of Inland Reven...