← All Authorities
Singapore uncategorised

BPC v BPB

[2019] 1 SLR 608
JurisdictionSingapore
CourtSingapore Court of Appeal
Year2019
StatusBinding authority

Summary

In child relocation applications, the welfare of the child is the paramount consideration, requiring structured analysis of the impact on the child's relationship with both parents.

Key Principle

relocation of child; welfare of child paramount; structured analysis; impact on child's relationship with both parents

Area of Law

family

Related Cases

Masson v Parsons (2019) 266 CLR 554

A known sperm donor may be recognised as a legal parent under the Family Law Act 1975, overriding inconsistent State presumptions, with paramount consideration given to the best interests of the child.

Stanford v Stanford (2012) 247 CLR 108
Stanford v Stanford (Just and Equitable Threshold) [2012] HCA 52

A property settlement order under s.79 FLA may only be made if it is just and equitable to alter existing property interests, which must be determined as a threshold question.

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of BPC v BPB and how it applies to your situation.

Explain BPC v BPB