← All Authorities
Singapore uncategorised

VDZ v VEA

[2020] SGCA 75
JurisdictionSingapore
CourtSingapore Court of Appeal
Year2020
StatusBinding authority

Summary

Court of Appeal applied the ANJ v ANK structured approach to divide matrimonial assets and drew adverse inference against a spouse for non-disclosure, uplifting the other spouse's share.

Key Principle

division of matrimonial assets; adverse inference for non-disclosure; ANJ v ANK structured approach; uplift for adverse inference

Area of Law

family

Related Cases

Masson v Parsons (2019) 266 CLR 554

A known sperm donor may be recognised as a legal parent under the Family Law Act 1975, overriding inconsistent State presumptions, with paramount consideration given to the best interests of the child.

Stanford v Stanford (2012) 247 CLR 108
Stanford v Stanford (Just and Equitable Threshold) [2012] HCA 52

A property settlement order under s.79 FLA may only be made if it is just and equitable to alter existing property interests, which must be determined as a threshold question.

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of VDZ v VEA and how it applies to your situation.

Explain VDZ v VEA