← All Authorities
United Kingdom Leading Case professional negligenceexpectation damagescompensatory damages

BPE Solicitors v Hughes-Holland

[2017] UKSC 21
JurisdictionUnited Kingdom
CourtUK Supreme Court
Year2017
StatusBinding authority

Summary

SAAMCO principle confirmed: a professional giving 'information' is only liable for losses attributable to that information being wrong, not all losses flowing from the transaction.

Key Principle

SAAMCO distinction between information and advice cases

Area of Law

Tort — Professional Negligence

Related Cases

Khan v Meadows [2021] UKSC 21

UKSC refined the SAAMCO scope-of-duty principle and established a six-stage framework for determining recoverable loss in professional negligence claims.

Montgomery v Lanarkshire Health Board [2015] UKSC 11

A doctor must disclose material risks that a reasonable patient in their position would consider significant, replacing the Bolam test for informed consent.

Jackson v Royal Bank of Scotland plc [2005] UKHL 3

Damages for breach of contract may include compensation for loss of a chance, assessed by reference to the probability that the lost opportunity would have been realised.

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of BPE Solicitors v Hughes-Holland and how it applies to your situation.

Explain BPE Solicitors v Hughes-Hollan...