← All Authorities
United Kingdom Leading Case professional negligenceduty of care

Montgomery v Lanarkshire Health Board

[2015] UKSC 11
JurisdictionUnited Kingdom
CourtUK Supreme Court
Year2015
StatusBinding authority

Summary

A doctor must disclose material risks that a reasonable patient in their position would consider significant, replacing the Bolam test for informed consent.

Key Principle

informed consent; doctor must disclose material risks a reasonable patient would consider significant

Area of Law

Tort — Professional Negligence

Related Cases

Khan v Meadows [2021] UKSC 21

UKSC refined the SAAMCO scope-of-duty principle and established a six-stage framework for determining recoverable loss in professional negligence claims.

BPE Solicitors v Hughes-Holland [2017] UKSC 21

SAAMCO principle confirmed: a professional giving 'information' is only liable for losses attributable to that information being wrong, not all losses flowing from the transaction.

Jackson v Royal Bank of Scotland plc [2005] UKHL 3

Damages for breach of contract may include compensation for loss of a chance, assessed by reference to the probability that the lost opportunity would have been realised.

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of Montgomery v Lanarkshire Health Board and how it applies to your situation.

Explain Montgomery v Lanarkshire Healt...