← All Authorities
United Kingdom illegalityattributionvaluers

Briggs J referred in Lexi Holdings v DTZ Debenham Tie Leugn Ltd

[2010] EWHC 2290 (Ch)
JurisdictionUnited Kingdom
CourtHigh Court of Justice, Chancery Division (Briggs J)
Year2010
StatusPersuasive authority

Key Principle

An interlocutory ruling by Briggs J in the Lexi/DTZ litigation engaging the question whether the illegality defence (ex turpi causa) and corporate attribution bar a company that is the victim of its own director's fraud from suing its professional advisers (valuers) in negligence — the point being whether, and where, the line is drawn for professional services collaterally or remotely connected to an unlawful transaction.

Area of Law

General

Related Cases

TNLC & Anor v Gambling Commission & Ors [2026] EWHC 891 (TCC)
Aabar Holdings S.A.R.L. and others v Glencore Plc and others [2026] EWHC 877 (Comm)
Waterside Class Limited v Mowi ASA & Ors [2026] CAT 32

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of Briggs J referred in Lexi Holdings v DTZ Debenham Tie Leugn Ltd and how it applies to your situation.

Explain Briggs J referred in Lexi Hold...