← All Authorities
United Kingdom service of claim formcpr 7.7 and 7.5

Brightside Group Ltd v RSM UK Audit LLP

[2017] EWHC 6 (Comm)
JurisdictionUnited Kingdom
CourtHigh Court of Justice, Queen's Bench Division (Commercial Court)
Year2017
StatusPersuasive authority

Key Principle

Compliance with a CPR 7.7 notice requiring a claimant to serve or discontinue is tested by reference to the step taken to serve under CPR 7.5(1) within the period, not by the later deemed date of service under CPR 6.14, so a claim form left at the authorised address within time is served in compliance even though deemed service falls later.

Area of Law

General

Related Cases

TNLC & Anor v Gambling Commission & Ors [2026] EWHC 891 (TCC)
Aabar Holdings S.A.R.L. and others v Glencore Plc and others [2026] EWHC 877 (Comm)
Waterside Class Limited v Mowi ASA & Ors [2026] CAT 32

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of Brightside Group Ltd v RSM UK Audit LLP and how it applies to your situation.

Explain Brightside Group Ltd v RSM UK ...