← All Authorities
United States Leading Case uncategorised

Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co v White

548 U.S. 53 (2006)
JurisdictionUnited States
CourtUS Supreme Court
Year2006
StatusBinding authority

Summary

Title VII's anti-retaliation provision applies to any employer action materially adverse to a reasonable employee, broader than the anti-discrimination standard.

Key Principle

Title VII's anti-retaliation provision covers employer actions that would be materially adverse to a reasonable employee, a broader standard than the anti-discrimination provision.

Area of Law

employment

Related Cases

Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union v Personnel Contracting Pty Ltd (2022) 275 CLR 165

Employee/independent contractor characterisation is determined by the legal rights and obligations in the written contract, not the totality of the relationship.

ZG Operations Australia Pty Ltd v Jamsek (2022) 275 CLR 215

HCA confirmed that employee/contractor distinction is determined by contractual terms alone, rejecting the multi-factorial totality-of-relationship test.

WorkPac Pty Ltd v Rossato (2021) 271 CLR 456

A casual employee's status is determined by the contractual terms at engagement; regularity of work pattern does not transform casual employment into permanent employment.

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co v White and how it applies to your situation.

Explain Burlington Northern & Santa Fe...