← All Authorities
United States takingsright to excludeunion access

Cedar Point Nursery v Hassid

594 US 139 (2021)
JurisdictionUnited States
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
Year2021
StatusBinding authority

Key Principle

A regulation granting union organisers physical access to an employer's property constitutes a per se taking under the Fifth Amendment; no balancing test is required for physical appropriation of property.

Area of Law

property

Related Cases

Tyler v Hennepin County 598 US 631 (2023)
Klein v. Martin 607 U. S. 213 (2026)
Glossip v Oklahoma 604 U.S. 226 (2025)

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of Cedar Point Nursery v Hassid and how it applies to your situation.

Explain Cedar Point Nursery v Hassid