← All Authorities
United States

Cedar Point Nursery v Hassid

594 US 139 (2021)
JurisdictionUnited States
Year2021
Statusunclear

Key Principle

A regulation granting union organisers physical access to an employer's property constitutes a per se taking under the Fifth Amendment; no balancing test is required for physical appropriation of property.

Area of Law

property

Related Cases

Zheng v Cai (2009) 239 CLR 446
Farah Constructions Pty Ltd v Say-Dee Pty Ltd (Knowing Receipt) [2007] HCA 22
Tanwar Enterprises Pty Ltd v Cauchi (Specific Performance) [2003] HCA 57

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of Cedar Point Nursery v Hassid and how it applies to your situation.

Explain Cedar Point Nursery v Hassid