← All Authorities
United States Leading Case competition and regulation

Central Bank of Denver NA v First Interstate Bank of Denver NA

511 U.S. 164 (1994)
JurisdictionUnited States
CourtUS Supreme Court
Year1994
StatusBinding authority

Summary

No private right of action exists for aiding and abetting violations of Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5.

Key Principle

There is no private right of action for aiding and abetting violations of Section 10(b) and Rule 10b-5.

Area of Law

securities

Related Cases

China Trends Holdings Ltd v Stock Exchange of Hong Kong Ltd [2026] HKCFI 783

Court upholds Stock Exchange of Hong Kong delisting decisions where properly made, affirming deference to exchange regulatory decisions.

HKSAR v Mak Kwong Yiu & Ors [2025] HKCFA 20

CFA clarified the conditions under which disclosure obligations arise under the Hong Kong Stock Exchange Listing Rules in a securities context.

Christine Ruth Ong Chai Hoon v Lam Kin Chung [2025] HKCFI 3857

HK Court of First Instance dismissed investors' misrepresentation claims arising from alleged false statements made in connection with a software company IPO.

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of Central Bank of Denver NA v First Interstate Bank of Denver NA and how it applies to your situation.

Explain Central Bank of Denver NA v Fi...