← All Authorities
United States competition and regulation

Goldman Sachs Group Inc v Arkansas Teacher Retirement System

594 U.S. 113 (2021)
JurisdictionUnited States
CourtUS Supreme Court
Year2021
StatusBinding authority

Summary

Defendant may rebut Basic presumption of reliance at class certification by showing generic misstatements had no price impact on the stock.

Key Principle

Basic presumption of reliance; defendant can rebut at certification by showing generic misstatements did not impact stock price

Area of Law

securities

Related Cases

China Trends Holdings Ltd v Stock Exchange of Hong Kong Ltd [2026] HKCFI 783

Court upholds Stock Exchange of Hong Kong delisting decisions where properly made, affirming deference to exchange regulatory decisions.

HKSAR v Mak Kwong Yiu & Ors [2025] HKCFA 20

CFA clarified the conditions under which disclosure obligations arise under the Hong Kong Stock Exchange Listing Rules in a securities context.

Christine Ruth Ong Chai Hoon v Lam Kin Chung [2025] HKCFI 3857

HK Court of First Instance dismissed investors' misrepresentation claims arising from alleged false statements made in connection with a software company IPO.

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of Goldman Sachs Group Inc v Arkansas Teacher Retirement System and how it applies to your situation.

Explain Goldman Sachs Group Inc v Arka...