← All Authorities
United Kingdom misrepresentationentire agreement clauseshare purchase agreement

Central Investment Group SA v Adria Cable S.a.r.l.

Bikam OOD, Central Investment Group SA v Adria Cable S.a.r.l. [2012] EWHC 621 (Comm)
JurisdictionUnited Kingdom
CourtHigh Court of Justice, Queen's Bench Division (Commercial Court)
Year2012
StatusPersuasive authority

Key Principle

Where a share purchase agreement sets out an exhaustive, carefully limited scheme of warranties as the buyer's sole remedy and excludes reliance on representations made outside the agreement, the court will not construe it so as to permit a free-standing misrepresentation claim that would bypass those contractual limitations.

Area of Law

General

Related Cases

TNLC & Anor v Gambling Commission & Ors [2026] EWHC 891 (TCC)
Aabar Holdings S.A.R.L. and others v Glencore Plc and others [2026] EWHC 877 (Comm)
Waterside Class Limited v Mowi ASA & Ors [2026] CAT 32

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of Central Investment Group SA v Adria Cable S.a.r.l. and how it applies to your situation.

Explain Central Investment Group SA v ...