← All Authorities
United Kingdom security for costsstifling claim

Chemistree Homecare Limited v Teva Pharmaceuticals Ltd

[2011] EWHC 2979 (Ch)
JurisdictionUnited Kingdom
CourtHigh Court (Chancery Division)
Year2011
StatusBinding authority

Key Principle

On an application for security for costs against a company under CPR 25.13(2)(c), 'inability to pay' means inability to pay the costs when they fall due, requiring an assessment of the cash or readily realisable assets the claimant may be expected to have available at that date, with the qualifying words 'reason to believe' watering down the threshold below proof on the balance of probabilities.

Area of Law

General

Related Cases

TNLC & Anor v Gambling Commission & Ors [2026] EWHC 891 (TCC)
Aabar Holdings S.A.R.L. and others v Glencore Plc and others [2026] EWHC 877 (Comm)
Waterside Class Limited v Mowi ASA & Ors [2026] CAT 32

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of Chemistree Homecare Limited v Teva Pharmaceuticals Ltd and how it applies to your situation.

Explain Chemistree Homecare Limited v ...