← All Authorities
Hong Kong convention rightsarticle 39 iccpr incorporation

Chiang Lily v Secretary for Justice

(2010) 13 HKCFAR 208
JurisdictionHong Kong
CourtHK Court of Final Appeal
Year2010
StatusBinding authority

Summary

HK Court of Final Appeal considered whether a medium of instruction language requirement in employment constitutes indirect racial discrimination under the Race Discrimination Ordinance.

Key Principle

Race Discrimination Ordinance (RDO); medium of instruction policy; whether language requirement constitutes indirect racial discrimination

Area of Law

employment

Related Cases

Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union v Personnel Contracting Pty Ltd (2022) 275 CLR 165

Employee/independent contractor characterisation is determined by the legal rights and obligations in the written contract, not the totality of the relationship.

ZG Operations Australia Pty Ltd v Jamsek (2022) 275 CLR 215

HCA confirmed that employee/contractor distinction is determined by contractual terms alone, rejecting the multi-factorial totality-of-relationship test.

WorkPac Pty Ltd v Rossato (2021) 271 CLR 456

A casual employee's status is determined by the contractual terms at engagement; regularity of work pattern does not transform casual employment into permanent employment.

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of Chiang Lily v Secretary for Justice and how it applies to your situation.

Explain Chiang Lily v Secretary for Ju...