← All Authorities
Singapore bills of ladingmarine insurancesecurity interestsactual authority

CIMB Bank Bhd v World Fuel Services (Singapore) Pte Ltd

[2021] SGCA 19
JurisdictionSingapore
CourtSingapore Court of Appeal
Year2021
StatusBinding authority

Summary

Singapore Court of Appeal considered maritime liens for necessaries (bunker supply), title to sue under transferred bills of lading, and privity/assignment issues in shipping claims.

Key Principle

maritime lien for necessaries; bunker supply claims; title to sue under transferred bills of lading; privity and assignment

Area of Law

shipping

Related Cases

Compania Sud Americana de Vapores SA v Hin-Pro International Logistics Ltd (2016) 19 HKCFAR 586

An exclusive jurisdiction clause in a bill of lading may be enforced by anti-suit injunction, balancing comity and the strength of the clause.

Nippon Catalyst Pte Ltd v PT Trans-Pacific Petrochemical Indotama [2018] SGHC 126

Under a bill of lading governed by the Hague-Visby Rules, a carrier's obligation to properly load and stow cargo is non-delegable.

The Chem Orchid [2015] 2 SLR 1020

Admiralty collision case applying International Regulations for Preventing Collisions at Sea to apportion liability between vessels.

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of CIMB Bank Bhd v World Fuel Services (Singapore) Pte Ltd and how it applies to your situation.

Explain CIMB Bank Bhd v World Fuel Ser...