← All Authorities
Singapore scopeinternational arbitration actarbitration agreement

Nippon Catalyst Pte Ltd v PT Trans-Pacific Petrochemical Indotama

[2018] SGHC 126
JurisdictionSingapore
CourtSingapore High Court
Year2018
StatusBinding authority

Key Principle

The Singapore High Court upheld a stay of court proceedings in favour of arbitration under s 6 of the International Arbitration Act, holding that where tort claims (including conversion) are 'intricately tied' to a contract containing an arbitration clause, those claims fall within the scope of the arbitration agreement regardless of being framed in tort rather than contract.

Area of Law

shipping

Related Cases

CIMB Bank Bhd v World Fuel Services (Singapore) Pte Ltd CIMB Bank Berhad v World Fuel Services (Singapore) Pte Ltd and another appeal [2021] SGCA 19
The Chem Orchid [2015] 2 SLR 1020
Burgundy Global Exploration Corp v Transocean Offshore International Ventures Ltd [2014] 3 SLR 381

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of Nippon Catalyst Pte Ltd v PT Trans-Pacific Petrochemical Indotama and how it applies to your situation.

Explain Nippon Catalyst Pte Ltd v PT T...