← All Authorities
Singapore authenticity of documentsconflicting termsset off

CIMB Bank Bhd v World Fuel Services (Singapore) Pte Ltd

CIMB Bank Berhad v World Fuel Services (Singapore) Pte Ltd and another appeal [2021] SGCA 19
JurisdictionSingapore
CourtSingapore Court of Appeal
Year2021
StatusBinding authority

Key Principle

Where a party bears the burden of proving a document's authenticity, producing the original is insufficient; execution must be proved by direct or circumstantial evidence, and where two contractual documents conflict, a specifically negotiated bilateral agreement prevails over a party's unilateral standard terms.

Area of Law

shipping

Related Cases

Nippon Catalyst Pte Ltd v PT Trans-Pacific Petrochemical Indotama [2018] SGHC 126
The Chem Orchid [2015] 2 SLR 1020
Burgundy Global Exploration Corp v Transocean Offshore International Ventures Ltd [2014] 3 SLR 381

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of CIMB Bank Bhd v World Fuel Services (Singapore) Pte Ltd and how it applies to your situation.

Explain CIMB Bank Bhd v World Fuel Ser...