← All Authorities
United States Leading Case set offinsolvency set off

Citizens Bank of Maryland v Strumpf

516 U.S. 16 (1995)
JurisdictionUnited States
CourtUS Supreme Court
Year1995
StatusBinding authority

Summary

A bank's temporary administrative hold on a debtor's deposit account to preserve setoff rights does not violate the automatic stay in bankruptcy proceedings.

Key Principle

Bank's right of setoff against depositor's account; temporary administrative hold is not violation of automatic stay in bankruptcy; banker's lien

Area of Law

banking

Related Cases

Westpac Banking Corporation v Lenthall (2019) 272 CLR 1

A bank owes a duty of care to guarantors to take reasonable steps to ensure they understand the nature and effect of the guarantee under the Code of Banking Practice.

AUSTRAC v Commonwealth Bank of Australia [2018] FCA 930

CBA liable for systemic AML/CTF Act contraventions including failure to report suspicious matters and threshold transactions via intelligent deposit machines, resulting in $700 million civil penalty.

Paciocco v ANZ Banking Group Ltd (Full Federal Court) (2015) 236 FCR 199

Full Federal Court held that bank late payment fees were not penalties or unconscionable under consumer protection law as they bore a genuine pre-estimate of loss or legitimate commercial interest.

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of Citizens Bank of Maryland v Strumpf and how it applies to your situation.

Explain Citizens Bank of Maryland v St...