← All Authorities
Australia Leading Case implied termsgood faith and relational contracts

Commonwealth Bank of Australia v Barker

(2014) 253 CLR 169
JurisdictionAustralia
CourtHigh Court of Australia
Year2014
StatusBinding authority

Summary

Australian law does not recognise an implied duty of mutual trust and confidence in employment contracts, departing from the UK position in Malik v BCCI.

Key Principle

no implied duty of mutual trust and confidence in Australian employment contracts; departed from UK Malik v BCCI

Area of Law

Employment

Related Cases

Byrne v Australian Airlines Ltd (1995) 185 CLR 410

The High Court considered the implication of terms into employment contracts, including whether a term of good faith or fair dealing could be implied at common law to constrain unfair dismissal.

Tadjudin v Bank of America NA (2016) 19 HKCFAR 690

An employer must not exercise contractual discretion irrationally or in bad faith; HK leading authority equivalent to Braganza on implied limitations on contractual discretion.

Li Chi Wing v Cheung Ka Wing [2013] 1 HKLRD 839

HK court applied the reasonableness test to assess the validity of restrictive covenants in employment contracts, examining scope, duration, and geographic limits.

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of Commonwealth Bank of Australia v Barker and how it applies to your situation.

Explain Commonwealth Bank of Australia...