← All Authorities
United States us whitebook bridge

Conley v. Gibson

355 U.S. 41 (1957)
JurisdictionUnited States
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
Year1957
StatusBinding authority

Summary

Classic notice-pleading formulation; “no set of facts” language later rejected as the operative test by Twombly

Key Principle

Classic notice-pleading formulation; “no set of facts” language later rejected as the operative test by Twombly

Area of Law

Civil Procedure — FRCP 8 9 12 pleadings and motions

Related Cases

Ashcroft v. Iqbal 556 U.S. 662 (2009)

Plausibility standard applies to all civil cases; disregard conclusory allegations; context-specific judgment using experience and common sense

Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly 550 U.S. 544 (2007)

Rule 8 requires factual allegations plausibly suggesting entitlement to relief; retires Conley “no set of facts” as the sufficiency standard

Tellabs, Inc. v. Makor Issues & Rights, Ltd. 551 U.S. 308 (2007)

PSLRA scienter pleading — strong-inference standard in securities fraud (heightened statutory regime interacting with Rule 9)

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of Conley v. Gibson and how it applies to your situation.

Explain Conley v. Gibson