← All Authorities
United Kingdom leasehold enfranchisementstatutory notices

Cornwall Crescent London Ltd v Kensington & Chelsea

[2005] EWCA Civ 324
JurisdictionUnited Kingdom
CourtCourt of Appeal (Civil Division)
Year2005
StatusBinding authority

Key Principle

The requirement (from Cadogan v Morris) that a tenant's initial notice of claim under s.13 Leasehold Reform, Housing and Urban Development Act 1993 propose a realistic price does not apply to a landlord's counter-notice under s.21; a landlord's counter-notice may propose any figure, however high, and is valid provided it is a genuine, bona fide (non-sham) proposal.

Area of Law

General

Related Cases

TNLC & Anor v Gambling Commission & Ors [2026] EWHC 891 (TCC)
Aabar Holdings S.A.R.L. and others v Glencore Plc and others [2026] EWHC 877 (Comm)
Waterside Class Limited v Mowi ASA & Ors [2026] CAT 32

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of Cornwall Crescent London Ltd v Kensington & Chelsea and how it applies to your situation.

Explain Cornwall Crescent London Ltd v...