← All Authorities
United Kingdom medicalstandard of carecausation

Crawford v Penney

Crawford (Litigation guardian of) v Penney, [2003] OJ No 89 (Ont SCJ), aff'd [2004] OJ No 3669 (Ont CA)
JurisdictionUnited Kingdom
CourtOntario Superior Court of Justice
Year2003
StatusPersuasive authority

Key Principle

Obstetricians and family physicians managing labour breach the standard of care where they fail to detect and respond to fetal distress and warning signs, increase oxytocin when contraindicated, or fail to refer or exercise independent clinical judgment, and are liable for the resulting catastrophic birth injury where causation is established on the evidence.

Area of Law

General

Related Cases

TNLC & Anor v Gambling Commission & Ors [2026] EWHC 891 (TCC)
Aabar Holdings S.A.R.L. and others v Glencore Plc and others [2026] EWHC 877 (Comm)
Waterside Class Limited v Mowi ASA & Ors [2026] CAT 32

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of Crawford v Penney and how it applies to your situation.

Explain Crawford v Penney