← All Authorities
United Kingdom Leading Case deceit

Derry v Peek

(1889) 14 App Cas 337
JurisdictionUnited Kingdom
CourtHouse of Lords
Year1889
StatusBinding authority

Summary

Deceit requires a false representation made knowingly, without belief in its truth, or recklessly as to its truth; mere negligence is insufficient.

Key Principle

The tort of deceit requires proof that the defendant made a false representation (1) knowingly, (2) without belief in its truth, or (3) recklessly; mere negligence does not suffice.

Area of Law

tort

Related Cases

Bird v DP (A Pseudonym) (2024) 98 ALJR 486

High Court of Australia held a religious organisation vicariously liable for sexual abuse by a priest, recognising a relationship akin to employment sufficient to ground vicarious liability.

Bryant v Badenoch Integrated Logging Pty Ltd (2023) 278 CLR 99

High Court of Australia held that the peak indebtedness rule does not apply when assessing unfair preferences under s 588FA of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth).

Kozarov v Victoria (2022) 275 CLR 115

An employer owes a duty to take reasonable steps to protect an employee from psychiatric injury caused by vicarious trauma, and may breach that duty by failing to act on obvious warning signs.

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of Derry v Peek and how it applies to your situation.

Explain Derry v Peek