← All Authorities
United Kingdom guaranteeconclusive evidence clausederivatives

Directors rely on Sucden Financial v Fluxo-Cane

[2009] EWHC 3555 (QB)
JurisdictionUnited Kingdom
CourtHigh Court of Justice, Queen's Bench Division (Commercial Court) (Blair J)
Year2009
StatusPersuasive authority

Key Principle

A 'conclusive evidence' clause in a guarantee, under which a broker's notice of default is conclusive evidence of the guarantor's liability, is effective and entitles the broker to judgment for the guaranteed balance following close-out of the client's positions.

Area of Law

General

Related Cases

TNLC & Anor v Gambling Commission & Ors [2026] EWHC 891 (TCC)
Aabar Holdings S.A.R.L. and others v Glencore Plc and others [2026] EWHC 877 (Comm)
Waterside Class Limited v Mowi ASA & Ors [2026] CAT 32

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of Directors rely on Sucden Financial v Fluxo-Cane and how it applies to your situation.

Explain Directors rely on Sucden Finan...