← All Authorities
United Kingdom Leading Case implied termsexpectation damages

Eastwood v Magnox Electric plc

[2004] UKHL 35
JurisdictionUnited Kingdom
CourtUK House of Lords
Year2004
StatusBinding authority

Summary

Damages for breach of implied mutual trust and confidence are recoverable for pre-dismissal conduct; the Johnson exclusion zone does not bar such claims.

Key Principle

Damages for breach of the implied term of mutual trust and confidence before dismissal are recoverable; the Johnson exclusion zone (preventing common law claims that effectively challenge dismissal) does not extend to pre-dismissal conduct.

Area of Law

employment

Related Cases

Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union v Personnel Contracting Pty Ltd (2022) 275 CLR 165

Employee/independent contractor characterisation is determined by the legal rights and obligations in the written contract, not the totality of the relationship.

ZG Operations Australia Pty Ltd v Jamsek (2022) 275 CLR 215

HCA confirmed that employee/contractor distinction is determined by contractual terms alone, rejecting the multi-factorial totality-of-relationship test.

WorkPac Pty Ltd v Rossato (2021) 271 CLR 456

A casual employee's status is determined by the contractual terms at engagement; regularity of work pattern does not transform casual employment into permanent employment.

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of Eastwood v Magnox Electric plc and how it applies to your situation.

Explain Eastwood v Magnox Electric plc