← All Authorities
United Kingdom Leading Case conflict of interest s175minority protectioncorporate capacity and ultra vires

Eclairs Group Ltd v JKX Oil and Gas plc

[2015] UKSC 71
JurisdictionUnited Kingdom
CourtUK Supreme Court
Year2015
StatusBinding authority

Summary

Directors' exercise of power to issue restriction notices is vitiated if the predominant purpose is improper, applying the proper purpose doctrine to board powers.

Key Principle

proper purpose doctrine; directors' restriction notices vitiated by improper predominant purpose

Area of Law

Company and Partnership

Related Cases

Bilta (UK) Ltd v Nazir (No 2) [2015] UKSC 23

A director's fraud cannot be attributed to the company so as to enable the wrongdoer to invoke the illegality defence against the company's own claims.

Prest v Petrodel Resources Ltd [2013] UKSC 34

The corporate veil may only be pierced where a person under an existing legal obligation deliberately interposes a company to evade it; the concealment principle is distinct and does not pierce the veil.

VTB Capital plc v Nutritek International Corp [2013] UKSC 5

Fraud alone does not justify piercing the corporate veil; separate legal personality is not automatically disregarded even in fraudulent contexts.

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of Eclairs Group Ltd v JKX Oil and Gas plc and how it applies to your situation.

Explain Eclairs Group Ltd v JKX Oil an...