← All Authorities
United Kingdom Leading Case separate legal personalityforum non conveniens

VTB Capital plc v Nutritek International Corp

[2013] UKSC 5
JurisdictionUnited Kingdom
CourtUK Supreme Court
Year2013
StatusBinding authority

Summary

Fraud alone does not justify piercing the corporate veil; separate legal personality is not automatically disregarded even in fraudulent contexts.

Key Principle

limits of veil piercing; fraud does not automatically justify disregarding corporate personality

Area of Law

Company and Partnership

Related Cases

Eclairs Group Ltd v JKX Oil and Gas plc [2015] UKSC 71

Directors' exercise of power to issue restriction notices is vitiated if the predominant purpose is improper, applying the proper purpose doctrine to board powers.

Bilta (UK) Ltd v Nazir (No 2) [2015] UKSC 23

A director's fraud cannot be attributed to the company so as to enable the wrongdoer to invoke the illegality defence against the company's own claims.

Prest v Petrodel Resources Ltd [2013] UKSC 34

The corporate veil may only be pierced where a person under an existing legal obligation deliberately interposes a company to evade it; the concealment principle is distinct and does not pierce the veil.

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of VTB Capital plc v Nutritek International Corp and how it applies to your situation.

Explain VTB Capital plc v Nutritek Int...