← All Authorities
Singapore arbitration agreementscommercial

Far East Square Pte Ltd v Yau Lee Construction (Singapore) Pte Ltd

[2019] 2 SLR 189
JurisdictionSingapore
CourtSingapore Court of Appeal
Year2019
StatusBinding authority

Summary

Under the SOP Act s 10, a claimant cannot re-serve the same payment claim for the same reference period once a valid claim has already been served.

Key Principle

SOP Act; repeat payment claims; whether same payment claim can be re-served; s 10 interpretation

Area of Law

construction

Related Cases

KONE Elevator (HK) Ltd v Construction Industry Council [2026] HKCA 115

Court of Appeal affirmed the validity of a statutory levy imposed by the Construction Industry Council for lift and escalator maintenance works.

Hip Hing Construction Company Limited v Hong Kong Airlines Ltd [2024] HKCFI 370

Judicial determination required to assess the extent to which retention monies may be withheld under construction contracts.

Kone Elevator (HK) Ltd v Construction Industry Council [2023] HKDC 1216

Court interpreted Part 5 of the Construction Industry Council Ordinance in a construction industry regulatory dispute.

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of Far East Square Pte Ltd v Yau Lee Construction (Singapore) Pte Ltd and how it applies to your situation.

Explain Far East Square Pte Ltd v Yau ...