← All Authorities
United Kingdom
disputed debtindemnitygambling and betting
Feldman v Nissim
[2010] EWHC 1353 (Ch)
Key Principle
On an application to set aside a statutory demand the debtor must establish that the debt is genuinely disputed on substantial grounds; an undisputed indemnity agreement (here, to indemnify the other party against spread-betting losses) gives rise to an enforceable debt that cannot be resisted by unsubstantiated assertions that the transactions fell outside the agreed arrangement.
Area of Law
General
Related Cases
Ask CommonBench about this case
Get a detailed analysis of Feldman v Nissim and how it applies to your situation.
Explain Feldman v Nissim