← All Authorities
United Kingdom
subrogationfirenegligence
FH Vahlsing Inc v Hartford Fire Insurance Co
F.H. Vahlsing, Inc. v. Hartford Fire Ins. Co., 108 S.W.2d 947 (Tex. Civ. App.—San Antonio 1937, writ dism'd w.o.j.)
Key Principle
A fire insurer that has paid the insured under a policy containing a subrogation clause is subrogated, to the extent of its payment, to the insured's rights of recovery against a third party whose act or neglect caused the fire loss.
Area of Law
General
Related Cases