← All Authorities
United Kingdom Leading Case derivative claims shareholderseparate legal personality

Foss v Harbottle

(1843) 2 Hare 461
JurisdictionUnited Kingdom
CourtCourt of Chancery
Year1843
StatusBinding authority

Summary

The company is the proper plaintiff for wrongs done to it, and the majority may ratify such wrongs, preventing individual shareholders from suing on the company's behalf.

Key Principle

proper plaintiff rule; the company is the proper plaintiff for wrongs done to it

Area of Law

Company and Partnership

Related Cases

Eclairs Group Ltd v JKX Oil and Gas plc [2015] UKSC 71

Directors' exercise of power to issue restriction notices is vitiated if the predominant purpose is improper, applying the proper purpose doctrine to board powers.

Bilta (UK) Ltd v Nazir (No 2) [2015] UKSC 23

A director's fraud cannot be attributed to the company so as to enable the wrongdoer to invoke the illegality defence against the company's own claims.

Prest v Petrodel Resources Ltd [2013] UKSC 34

The corporate veil may only be pierced where a person under an existing legal obligation deliberately interposes a company to evade it; the concealment principle is distinct and does not pierce the veil.

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of Foss v Harbottle and how it applies to your situation.

Explain Foss v Harbottle