← All Authorities
Hong Kong banking and financeexpress termsconstruction interpretation

Gao Yanling v Credit Suisse AG, Hong Kong Branch

[2024] 2 HKLRD 104
JurisdictionHong Kong
CourtHK Court of Appeal
Year2024
StatusBinding authority

Summary

Standard banking terms in bank-customer relationships will be upheld where properly interpreted and applied.

Key Principle

Standard banking terms in bank-customer relationships will be upheld where properly interpreted and applied.

Area of Law

banking

Related Cases

Westpac Banking Corporation v Lenthall (2019) 272 CLR 1

A bank owes a duty of care to guarantors to take reasonable steps to ensure they understand the nature and effect of the guarantee under the Code of Banking Practice.

AUSTRAC v Commonwealth Bank of Australia [2018] FCA 930

CBA liable for systemic AML/CTF Act contraventions including failure to report suspicious matters and threshold transactions via intelligent deposit machines, resulting in $700 million civil penalty.

Paciocco v ANZ Banking Group Ltd (Full Federal Court) (2015) 236 FCR 199

Full Federal Court held that bank late payment fees were not penalties or unconscionable under consumer protection law as they bore a genuine pre-estimate of loss or legitimate commercial interest.

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of Gao Yanling v Credit Suisse AG, Hong Kong Branch and how it applies to your situation.

Explain Gao Yanling v Credit Suisse AG...