← All Authorities
Australia Leading Case duty of carepsychiatric injury

Gifford v Strang Patrick Stevedoring Pty Ltd

(2003) 214 CLR 269
JurisdictionAustralia
CourtHigh Court of Australia
Year2003
StatusBinding authority

Summary

An employer owes a duty of care in negligence to close family members of an injured worker who suffer psychiatric injury as a result of witnessing or learning of the worker's injury.

Key Principle

duty of care owed to family members of injured workers; nervous shock claim by close relatives

Area of Law

tort

Related Cases

Bird v DP (A Pseudonym) (2024) 98 ALJR 486

High Court of Australia held a religious organisation vicariously liable for sexual abuse by a priest, recognising a relationship akin to employment sufficient to ground vicarious liability.

Bryant v Badenoch Integrated Logging Pty Ltd (2023) 278 CLR 99

High Court of Australia held that the peak indebtedness rule does not apply when assessing unfair preferences under s 588FA of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth).

Kozarov v Victoria (2022) 275 CLR 115

An employer owes a duty to take reasonable steps to protect an employee from psychiatric injury caused by vicarious trauma, and may breach that duty by failing to act on obvious warning signs.

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of Gifford v Strang Patrick Stevedoring Pty Ltd and how it applies to your situation.

Explain Gifford v Strang Patrick Steve...