← All Authorities
United Kingdom
proprietary estoppelestoppelunconscionability
Gillett v Holt
[2001] Ch 210
Key Principle
Proprietary estoppel requires assurance, reliance and detriment, which are not separate watertight compartments but interrelated elements to be considered in the round with unconscionability as the unifying test; an assurance need not be irrevocable when made, because it is the subsequent detrimental reliance that renders it binding, and detriment is not confined to the expenditure of money.
Area of Law
General
Related Cases
Ask CommonBench about this case
Get a detailed analysis of Gillett v Holt and how it applies to your situation.
Explain Gillett v Holt