← All Authorities
United Kingdom proprietary estoppelestoppelunconscionability

Gillett v Holt

[2001] Ch 210
JurisdictionUnited Kingdom
CourtCourt of Appeal (Civil Division)
Year2001
StatusBinding authority

Key Principle

Proprietary estoppel requires assurance, reliance and detriment, which are not separate watertight compartments but interrelated elements to be considered in the round with unconscionability as the unifying test; an assurance need not be irrevocable when made, because it is the subsequent detrimental reliance that renders it binding, and detriment is not confined to the expenditure of money.

Area of Law

General

Related Cases

TNLC & Anor v Gambling Commission & Ors [2026] EWHC 891 (TCC)
Aabar Holdings S.A.R.L. and others v Glencore Plc and others [2026] EWHC 877 (Comm)
Waterside Class Limited v Mowi ASA & Ors [2026] CAT 32

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of Gillett v Holt and how it applies to your situation.

Explain Gillett v Holt