← All Authorities
United States interim injunctions american cyanamid

Granny Goose Foods Inc v Brotherhood of Teamsters

415 U.S. 423 (1974)
JurisdictionUnited States
CourtUS Supreme Court
Year1974
StatusBinding authority

Summary

TROs issued ex parte under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(b) are subject to strict time limits and procedural requirements enforceable in all courts.

Key Principle

TRO time limits under Rule 65(b)

Area of Law

Injunctive Relief

Related Cases

Convoy Collateral Ltd v Broad Idea International Ltd [2021] UKPC 24

Freezing injunctions are a free-standing equitable remedy available in support of enforcement, not limited to pending or existing proceedings.

China Medical Technologies Inc (in liq) v Samson Med Tech Ltd [2014] 1 HKLRD 990

Mareva injunction principles, including worldwide freezing orders, applied in the context of HK liquidation proceedings.

Brink's Mat Ltd v Elcombe [1988] 1 WLR 1350

Applicants for without-notice injunctions owe a duty of full and frank disclosure of all material facts, breach of which may lead to discharge of the order.

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of Granny Goose Foods Inc v Brotherhood of Teamsters and how it applies to your situation.

Explain Granny Goose Foods Inc v Broth...