← All Authorities
United Kingdom Leading Case banking and financewaiver and estoppel

Greenwood v Martins Bank Ltd

[1933] AC 51
JurisdictionUnited Kingdom
CourtUK House of Lords
Year1933
StatusBinding authority

Summary

A bank customer who knows of forgeries on their account and fails to notify the bank is estopped by silence from later claiming against the bank for those forgeries.

Key Principle

Customer's duty to disclose forgery on account; estoppel by silence; failure to notify bank of spouse's forgeries on cheques

Area of Law

banking

Related Cases

Westpac Banking Corporation v Lenthall (2019) 272 CLR 1

A bank owes a duty of care to guarantors to take reasonable steps to ensure they understand the nature and effect of the guarantee under the Code of Banking Practice.

AUSTRAC v Commonwealth Bank of Australia [2018] FCA 930

CBA liable for systemic AML/CTF Act contraventions including failure to report suspicious matters and threshold transactions via intelligent deposit machines, resulting in $700 million civil penalty.

Paciocco v ANZ Banking Group Ltd (Full Federal Court) (2015) 236 FCR 199

Full Federal Court held that bank late payment fees were not penalties or unconscionable under consumer protection law as they bore a genuine pre-estimate of loss or legitimate commercial interest.

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of Greenwood v Martins Bank Ltd and how it applies to your situation.

Explain Greenwood v Martins Bank Ltd